Received Sep 10; Accepted Sep Some interrogations utilize very aggressive techniques determined to be torture by many nations and organizations throughout the world.
According to their press release from a year ago 29 August The Task Force Report prohibits psychologists from any participation whatsoever in such abusive behaviors and places an ethical obligation on psychologists to be alert to and report abusive behaviors to the authorities.
The Council of Representatives stated that there are no exceptional circumstances whatsoever, whether induced by a state of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or any other public emergency, that may be invoked as a justification for torture, including the invocation of laws, regulations, or orders.
Psychologists do not engage in, direct, support, facilitate, or offer training in torture or other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment. However, the report does conclude that psychologists do have a role in consulting to interrogations: Psychologists may serve in various national security-related roles, such as a consultant to an interrogation, in a manner that is consistent with the Ethics Code, and when doing so psychologists are mindful of factors unique to these roles and contexts that require special ethical consideration.
The PENS report is a detailed analysis of some of the ethical issues involved. The American Psychiatric Association reiterates its position that psychiatrists should not participate in, or otherwise assist or facilitate, the commission of torture of any person. Direct participation includes being present in the interrogation room, asking or suggesting questions, or advising authorities on the use of specific techniques of interrogation with particular detainees.
However, according to their position statement […] psychiatrists may provide training to military or civilian investigative or law enforcement personnel on recognizing and responding to persons with mental illnesses, on the possible medical and psychological effects of particular techniques and conditions of interrogation, and on other areas within their professional expertise.
Here is the American Medical Association press release 12 June After careful consideration and broad input from experts, the American Medical Association has adopted ethical guidelines that limit physician participation in interrogation. The new AMA policy clearly states that physicians who engage in any activity that relies on their medical knowledge and skills must continue to uphold medical ethics.
Because it is justifiable for physicians to serve in roles that serve the public interest, the AMA policy permits physicians to develop general interrogation strategies that are not coercive, but are humane and respect the rights of individuals.
In case anyone is wondering, the British Psychological Society declaration concerning torture was issued in April announced in a 31 March press release and includes the following: Psychologists shall not knowingly provide any premises, instruments, substances or knowledge that facilitates the practice of torture or other forms of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or that diminishes the ability of the victim to resist such treatment.
Psychologists shall not be present during any procedure during which torture or other forms of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment is used or threatened. You can find the whole short declaration in The Psychologist 18 4Aprilavailable online here pdf. To sum up, I think the positions are: No participating in torture, no advising on methods that could be considered torture, but ok to act as consultants to interrogation and information-gathering for national security purposes.
No participating in torture, no advising on methods that could be considered torture, no participation in interrogations, no advising on specific interrogations, but ok to offer generic training to interrogators. No participating in torture, no monitoring for medical purposes an interrogation where torture is used, but ok to help develop generic, non-coercive interrogation strategies.
No participating in torture, no advising on or training in methods that could be considered torture.
No comment about whether it is ok to act as consultants to interrogation.The policy adopted today clarifies that psychologists can only provide mental health services to military personnel or work for an independent third party to protect human rights at national security detention facilities deemed by the United Nations to be in violation of human rights, such as the U.N.
Convention Against Torture and the . Psychologists’ Participation in Military Interrogatory Operations The issue of ethical responsibility is always in question especially in the medical and allied medical fields.
The article “Psychologists Clash on Aiding Interrogations” (Carey, ) tackles this issue in the context of the services rendered by psychologists to military operations involving the interrogation of detainees.
US psychologists renew push for ban on assisting military interrogations American Psychological Association angered many by choosing not to censure psychologist who took part in Guantánamo.
The issue of ethical responsibility is always in question especially in the medical and allied medical fields. The article “Psychologists Clash on Aiding Interrogations” (Carey, ) tackles this issue in the context of the services rendered by psychologists to military operations involving the interrogation of detainees.
Sep 07, · For this paper, you will examine the ethical implications of a controversial topic related to forensic psychology. Choose from the following topics: Psychologists' involvement in military interrogations Psychologists' involvement in assessments related to death penalty cases In 1,, words, consider the following: Discuss human /5(50).
Therapy On Military Veterans With Ptsd Psychology Essay. Print Reference this PSTD is still an important phenomenon that calls for attention from psychologists and other academicians (Brian, Stanley, Sue, Katherine & Jill, ).
These are some of the real life stories which portray the effectiveness of equine therapy on military.